How Mickey Arthur’s time in Pakistan came to an end. Under a shadow of uncertainty and turmoil, Mickey Arthur’s time with the Pakistan cricket team came to an abrupt end. After Pakistan’s poor World Cup performance, the scene was set in Lahore’s Gaddafi Stadium, where Arthur, the team’s director, was waiting for a meeting with Zaka Ashraf, the head of the PCB management committee.
Arthur was anxiously awaiting the evaluation of Pakistan’s World Cup performance, even though he was concentrating on preparations for the country’s next Test trip of Australia. Arthur was informed unexpectedly during this break that the captain and every member of the support staff, including himself, were being replaced.
Cricket in Pakistan was rocked by this decision, as Arthur, team manager Rehan ul Haq, and head coach Grant Bradburn were all left off of the vital tours to Australia and New Zealand. They were replaced as team director and head coach by the inexperienced former Pakistan all-rounder Mohammad Hafeez.
The abrupt change in events raised a lot of unresolved issues and disagreement among cricketers. The removal of Arthur and the support personnel, who had been heavily involved in the tours’ planning, caused some people to wonder why they thought such was the case.
Also Read
Elgar Recalls Dispute with Kohli: From On-Field Incident to Drinks and Settlement
In his first interview following the incident, Arthur acknowledged the ambiguity surrounding the events that led to his dismissal and voiced his astonishment and concern about the decision. There was a cloud over Pakistan cricket following the sudden and rapid change in leadership, with questions expressed regarding the potential effects on the team’s future performance and morale.
As Pakistani cricket struggled to deal with Arthur’s departure, focus shifted to the difficulties that lay ahead, chief among them being the intimidating assignment of playing Australia in a Test series where Pakistan had never performed well in the past. A challenging position was made even more complex by the abrupt change in leadership, which made stakeholders and supporters of the team anxious for stability and clarity in the organization.
